dontneedfeminism
mr-cappadocia:

meh-i-dont-know:

mr-cappadocia:

cactuseeds:

mr-cappadocia:

perfectvic:

LITERALLY MY FAVORITE

And literally a fucking lie designed by the same woman who ensured that neither men nor women raped by women would be counted as rape victims.
But no… go on… spread that shit you ignorant fuck.



but no… go on… keep lying to yourself, you FLAMING BAGGIE OF DOG SHIT

You realize that number is based on surveys where even if the RESPONDENT didn’t consider themselves a rape victim the and the survey taker did… it was classified as a rape.

Do you have the proof to back up your claim
mr-cappadocia
?

Start here…
No… seriously… I want you to read this because a lot of people don’t grasp how thoroughly warped and fucked up this all is…

But where did the CDC find 13.7 million victims of sexual crimes that the professional criminologists had overlooked?
It found them by defining sexual violence in impossibly elastic ways and then letting the surveyors, rather than subjects, determine what counted as an assault. Consider: In a telephone survey with a 30 percent response rate, interviewers did not ask participants whether they had been raped. Instead of such straightforward questions, the CDC researchers described a series of sexual encounters and thentheydetermined whether the responses indicated sexual violation. A sample of 9,086 women was asked, for example, “When you were drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent, how many people ever had vaginal sex with you?” A majority of the 1.3 million women (61.5 percent) the CDC projected as rape victims in 2010 experienced this sort of “alcohol or drug facilitated penetration.”
What does that mean? If a woman was unconscious or severely incapacitated, everyone would call it rape. But what about sex while inebriated? Few people would say that intoxicated sex alone constitutes rape — indeed, a nontrivial percentage of all customary sexual intercourse, including marital intercourse, probably falls under that definition (and is therefore criminal according to the CDC).
Other survey questions were equally ambiguous. Participants were asked if they had ever had sex because someone pressured them by “telling you lies, making promises about the future they knew were untrue?” All affirmative answers were counted as “sexual violence.” Anyone who consented to sex because a suitor wore her or him down by “repeatedly asking” or “showing they were unhappy” was similarly classified as a victim of violence. The CDC effectively set a stage where each step of physical intimacy required a notarized testament of sober consent.

Did Dave promise to marry you and then didn’t? Did Frank proposition you for sex more than once? Did Steve become unhappy when you sexually rejected him?
Did you then have sex anyway?
CONGRATULATIONS… YOU’RE A RAPE VICTIM!!!
Yes, it really is this insane.

mr-cappadocia:

meh-i-dont-know:

mr-cappadocia:

cactuseeds:

mr-cappadocia:

perfectvic:

LITERALLY MY FAVORITE

And literally a fucking lie designed by the same woman who ensured that neither men nor women raped by women would be counted as rape victims.

But no… go on… spread that shit you ignorant fuck.

but no… go on… keep lying to yourself, you FLAMING BAGGIE OF DOG SHIT

You realize that number is based on surveys where even if the RESPONDENT didn’t consider themselves a rape victim the and the survey taker did… it was classified as a rape.

Do you have the proof to back up your claim
mr-cappadocia
?

Start here

No… seriously… I want you to read this because a lot of people don’t grasp how thoroughly warped and fucked up this all is…

But where did the CDC find 13.7 million victims of sexual crimes that the professional criminologists had overlooked?

It found them by defining sexual violence in impossibly elastic ways and then letting the surveyors, rather than subjects, determine what counted as an assault. Consider: In a telephone survey with a 30 percent response rate, interviewers did not ask participants whether they had been raped. Instead of such straightforward questions, the CDC researchers described a series of sexual encounters and thentheydetermined whether the responses indicated sexual violation. A sample of 9,086 women was asked, for example, “When you were drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent, how many people ever had vaginal sex with you?” A majority of the 1.3 million women (61.5 percent) the CDC projected as rape victims in 2010 experienced this sort of “alcohol or drug facilitated penetration.”

What does that mean? If a woman was unconscious or severely incapacitated, everyone would call it rape. But what about sex while inebriated? Few people would say that intoxicated sex alone constitutes rape — indeed, a nontrivial percentage of all customary sexual intercourse, including marital intercourse, probably falls under that definition (and is therefore criminal according to the CDC).

Other survey questions were equally ambiguous. Participants were asked if they had ever had sex because someone pressured them by “telling you lies, making promises about the future they knew were untrue?” All affirmative answers were counted as “sexual violence.” Anyone who consented to sex because a suitor wore her or him down by “repeatedly asking” or “showing they were unhappy” was similarly classified as a victim of violence. The CDC effectively set a stage where each step of physical intimacy required a notarized testament of sober consent.

Did Dave promise to marry you and then didn’t? Did Frank proposition you for sex more than once? Did Steve become unhappy when you sexually rejected him?

Did you then have sex anyway?

CONGRATULATIONS… YOU’RE A RAPE VICTIM!!!

Yes, it really is this insane.

twasitwas
damittromney:

thelustedwanderer:

helyon:

daemontool:

straight people are terrifying they can go as far as to give the girl skeleton a pair of bone titties to indicate its a straight relationship

Oh my fucking god

Actually, the skeleton with bone boobs is a male skeleton. From what I can see, the pelvic inlet is too narrow to be female, and the pubic arch is far too V shaped to be female. So this is scientifically two male skeletons.

the straights have been foiled again

damittromney:

thelustedwanderer:

helyon:

daemontool:

straight people are terrifying they can go as far as to give the girl skeleton a pair of bone titties to indicate its a straight relationship

Oh my fucking god

Actually, the skeleton with bone boobs is a male skeleton. From what I can see, the pelvic inlet is too narrow to be female, and the pubic arch is far too V shaped to be female. So this is scientifically two male skeletons.

the straights have been foiled again